To view these 18 verses as such is both … Continue reading "Commentary on John 1:[1-9], 10-18" All Rights Reserved. He does so by consistently using en of the Logos, the Word, and by consistently employing a totally different verb in reference to all other things. Note that Robertson translates the phrase, “the Word was God.” His argument is summed up well in the following passage: A word should be said concerning the use and non-use of the article in John 1:1, where a narrow path is safely followed by the author. Benjamin B. Warfield said: “And the Word was with God.” The language is pregnant. Donate As Robertson made reference to his voluminous Grammar in the above quotation, I will include it in its entirety: The word with the article is then the subject, whatever the order may be. There is simply no warrant in the language to do this. But most see that the assertion of the Apostle goes far beyond that. No one would dare publish such a “translation.” However, in 1950, the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society published its own translation of the Bible, The New World Translation of the Greek Scriptures. James White is the director of Alpha and Omega Ministries, a Christian apologetics organization based in Phoenix, Arizona. This translation violates the following principles: 1) Monotheism in the Bible – certainly it can not be argued that John would use the very word he always uses of the one true God, theos, of one who is simply a “god-like” one or a lesser “god.” The Scriptures do not teach that there is a whole host of intermediate beings that can be called “gods.” That is gnosticism. #4 “and the Word was God.” Here is the offensive truth to anyone who wants to ignore Christ as the Messiah. John 1:14 says, "And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we have seen his glory, glory as of the only Son from the Father, full of grace and truth." No matter how far back we may try to push our imagination, we can never reach a point at which we could say of the Divine Word, as Arius did, “There was once when he was not”.11. Those scholars who see the verse in this light are not necessarily in contradiction with the others already cited. In other words, John is not teaching the ancient heresy known as Sabellianism, which taught that Jesus and the Father and the Spirit are simply three different aspects of one person, i.e., Jesus is the Father, the Father is the Spirit, and so on. As it stands, the other persons of the Trinity may be implied in theos.7. John 1:(1-9), 10-18 is the assigned Gospel lesson for Christmas 2, Years A, B, and C. While John 1:1-9 is optional, verses 10-18 make little sense without the premises set out in the opening verses. In other words, if theos en ho logos is “a god,” how could John have said “the Word was God?” We have already seen that if John had employed the article before theos, he would have made the terms theos and logos interchangeable, amounting to Sabellianism. John’s first assertion is that “In the beginning was the Word.” Which beginning? The following is the only meaning that does not violate the interpretation of other Scriptures. Controversy has arisen over the meaning and interpretation of 1 John 1:9-10. Author: 1, 2, and 3 John have from earliest times been attributed to the apostle John, who also wrote the Gospel of John. This version translates John 1:1 in this way. Believers in Jesus must go on believing in Jesus in order to be saved in the end. John 1:1-3, 14, 18 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. Certainly one can hardly conceive of a higher Being. The Incarnation of the Word of Life. The unbelieving Jews called it blasphemy and sought to murder whoever made this claim. I am aware that this is a serious charge, however, the facts reveal that the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society has consistently refused to name any of its NWT translators, and of those who have been discovered, none had any more than two years of Greek and no formal Hebrew.19. How then are we to understand these two phrases? But Christ is the complete and perfect manifestation of the Word. He did not use the adjective, theios, which would describe a divine nature, or a god-like one. Then, is John talking about two “gods?” Can more than one being be fully eternal? EXEGESIS: JOHN 1:1-18. It is good to note Vincent’s comment that here “John is not trying to show who is God, but who is the Word.”10 The Logos is the central character here. But don’t get it in your head that the book is therefore only for unbelievers. Instead, he used theos, the very word John will use consistently for the Father, the “only true God” (John 17:3). From all eternity the Word has been with God as a fellow: He who in the very beginning already “was,” “was” also in communion with God. The next phrase says, “and the Word was with God.” Again we find the verb “was” cropping up, again pointing to the timelessness of the subject at hand. The structure of John 2:1-11 is typical of a miracle story: the setting is established (verses 1-2), a need arises (verses 3-5), a miracle addresses that need (verses 6-8), and there is a response to that miracle (verses 9-11). ESV In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. All things came into being by Him, and apart from Him nothing came into being that has come into being…And the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory, glory as of the only begotten from the Father, full of grace and truth… No man has seen God at any time; the only begotten God, who is in the bosom of the Father, He has explained Him. As it is, John asserts that in the Pre-incarnate state the Logos was God, though the Father was greater than the Son (John 14:28). That beginning goes back before creation. In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. Office Hours NIV In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. If we confess our sins, He is faithful and righteous to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness. These verses summarize Jesus’ ministry and mission on Earth. also hoi theristai angeloi eisin (Mt.13:39), ho logos ho sos alatheia estin (John 17:17), ho nomos hamartia; (Ro. Contact. See also ho theos agape estin (1 John.4:16). The prologue to John’s Gospel has long been a center of controversy when discussing the Deity of Christ, and naturally so. John 1:1 also means that, as God's Word, Jesus always communicated God's will to humanity, even in Old Testament revelation (Genesis 28:10-15, John 1:50-51, Exodus 17:6, 1 Corinthians 10:4). #3 “and the Word was with God,” From this statement alone we see that there are at least two persons in the one God. All people reading John’s words would understand that the Creator is God, not some lower being created by God to do the work for Him. 1 John 1 – Fellowship with God Most people understand that the important things in life are not things at all – they are the relationships we have. The Word is the Creator. 2 The life appeared; we have seen it and testify to it, and we proclaim to you the eternal life, which was with the Father and has appeared to us. What is suggested is an active relation of intercourse. When it is used in this way, it refers to the divine essence. The following article was originally an information sheet that we began distributing around 1985 . Question: "What do John 1:1,14 mean when they declare that Jesus is the Word of God?" It means “to be in company with someone”1 or to be “face-to-face.” It speaks of communion, interaction, fellowship. Jesus is referred to using the Greek word Logos, meaning “The Word.” This passage clearly describes Jesus as identical to God, and co-creator with God. “God” and “Word” are not interchangeable terms. This last phrase has come under heavy fire throughout the ages. NLT In the beginning the Word already existed. And the Word was as to His essence absolute deity.9. Notice that Wuest brings in the idea that the anarthrous predicate noun has a characterizing effect, and that it refers more to the nature of the subject of the clause than to an identification of it. ho logos sarx egeneto (John 1:14). Another scholarly source along this line is found in the Expositor’s Greek Testament: The Word is distinguishable from God and yet Theos en ho logos, the Word was God, of Divine nature; not “a God,” which to a Jewish ear would have been abominable; nor yet identical with all that can be called God, for then the article would have been inserted…12. (Robertson, Dana and Mantey, Bruce, Nicoll) Colwell’s rule also comes into play at this point. No, he filled the Word with personality and identified the Word not as some fuzzy, ethereal essence that was the guiding principle of all things, (as the Greeks thought), but as the eternal Son of God, the One Who entered into time, and into man’s experience as Jesus of Nazareth. John is not alone in this. A slightly different tact is taken by another group of scholars. So in John 1:14 ho Logos sarx egeneto, “the Word became flesh,” not “the flesh became Word.” Luther argues that here John disposes of Arianism also because the Logos was eternally God, fellowship of the Father and Son, what Origen called the Eternal Generation of the Son (each necessary to the other). He certainly revealed God's will when He came as the God/Man in Israel, and … Much has been said about how John got the term “Logos,” the Word. God the Son, the Word, was alongside God from all time and before. He came into the world as LIFE... to breathe 'new life' into the lifeless spirit of man that lay dead in trespasses and sins, and with no hope in the world. Store Jesus of Nazareth, the carpenter, the teacher, is Very God.8. And the Word was in fellowship with God the Father. Webcast 3) It ignores the position of theos in the clause – it comes first, and is emphatic. One can push back the “beginning” as far as you can imagine, and, according to John, the Word still is. 5 The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome [] it But the separate personality of the Logos is affirmed by the construction used and Sabellianism is denied. 2 He was with God in the beginning() 3 Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made() 4 In him was life, and that life was the light of all mankind. He uses the term three times of Jesus in the Gospel, here, in John 1:18, and in John 20:28. 1 John 1:9 (NASB) #2 “…was the Word,” The idea of “the Word” was captivating to the Greek philosophers who saw the Logos (Greek for word) as reason, and in some sense, the substance by which the universe was created, order out of chaos. It is simply the truth and must be accepted as such, leading us to worship in awe at the feet of the one whose “ways are higher than our ways” (Isa 55:9). The Gospel of John weds theology to poetry. Do You Struggle With Being Perfect. John 1:1-18 . 1-john 4:19 We love him, because he first loved us. The Bible is the written Word. The predicate “God” occupies the position of emphasis in this great declaration, and is so placed in the sentence as to be thrown up in sharp contrast with the phrase “with God,” as if to prevent inadequate inferences as to the nature of the Word being drawn even momentarily from that phrase. The logos, the Word, was in the beginning, was with God, and was God. #1 “In the beginning…” In parallel to Genesis chapter one, John seeks to show how God the Son was not made but had been begotten from all eternity. This is right in line with what Robertson said – that the Logos is not all of God, and that you cannot say “the God was the Logos.” The very context (kai ho logos en pros ton theon) demonstrates this fully. Jesus, as we know Him as the Word, does not constitute everything that is included in the Godhead. 1 That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked at and our hands have touched--this we proclaim concerning the Word of life. Instead, John here asserts the full Deity of Christ, while informing us that He is not the Father, but that they (“God” and the “Word”) have eternally co-existed. Try to detach yourself from that knowledge for a moment, and imagine what kind of being you would be imagining while reading about this Word. The Word is not a creation that came into existence at “the beginning,” for He antedates that beginning. Their fellowship and relationship precedes all else, and it is timeless. Jesus said in John 15:6, “If anyone does not abide in me he is thrown away like a branch and withers; and the branches are gathered, thrown into the fire, and burned.” And in John 8:31, he said, “If you abide in my word, you are truly my disciples”So when John says, “These are written so th… 1 John 1:1 through 1 John 2:2 Others could be added, but this is sufficient. 767f. John avoids confusion by telling us that the Word was with God, and the Word was God. Answer: The answer to this question is found by first understanding the reason why John wrote his gospel. Basically, the passage teaches that the Word, as to His essential nature, is God. Jesus is fully God and he manifested in the flesh in a manger to die on a cross. Hence, when we see that the Word was, as to His nature God, we can understand exactly how He can be with God and yet be God. It is imperative that the serious student of the Bible come to a basic understanding of logos, which is translated as “Word” in John 1:1.Most Trinitarians believe that the word logos refers directly to Jesus Christ, so in most versions of John logos is capitalized and translated “Word” (some versions even write “Jesus Christ” in John 1:1). The Logos became flesh (John 1:14), and not the Father. Again, these scholars are pointing out the use of the article to show the subject against the predicate in a clause. Obviously, therefore, if one can be described as creating everything, one must be the Creator, and certainly not a creation. Date of Writing: The Book of 1 John was likely written between A.D. 85-95. And Some Other Stuff, Doing Theology Live on TV with Call-Ins With Jet-Lag, Same Sex Controversy part 1 of 3: Sodom, and more from the JW Martin Smart, Advice for Witnessing to Mormons and Role Playing With “Elder Hahn”, The Only Begotten of the Father in the Flesh: Mormonism’s Embarrassing Theology. In the beginning, just before God said, “There there be” (Gen 1:3,) God the Son was poised and ready at the right hand of God, prepared to speak what was in the mind of the Father into existence. The preposition John uses here is quite revealing. In the beginning — Namely, of the creation, (for the evangelist evidently refers to the first word of the book of Genesis, בראשׁית, bereshith, rendered by the LXX. He is the revelation of God. The following article was originally an information sheet that we began distributing around 1985, Who We are Subject To, and a Response to Jimmy Akin on Pope Francis, The Strong Hold of Whiteness? There is simply nothing that is existent anywhere that was not created by the Word. They argue that this is supported by the phrase in 1 John 1:2, “was with the Father,” and by 2:13, 14, which refers to Jesus as existing “from the beginning.” (John Stott argues for this, The Epistles of John [Eerdmans], pp. John did not stop here, however. The Word Became Flesh. By not qualifying his statement, John assured that we could correctly understand his intention and his teaching concerning Christ, the Word. Statement of Faith This phrase, if taken completely alone, would be very confusing, since John has already asserted the eternality of the Word. Though Colwell’s rule is not exceptionless, it is a valuable guide. 1 That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked at and our hands have touched —this we proclaim concerning the Word of life. The fact that theos is the first word after the conjunction kai (and) shows that the main emphasis of the clause lies on it. We find his purpose clearly stated in John 20:30-31. It should also be noted that his article has been used extensively by those who would deny the Deity of Christ and mistranslate this passage. KJV In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 8am to 5pm MST The reason that theos is anarthrous is both that it is the predicate nominative (Robertson, Dana and Mantey) and that it is demanded by the fact that if it had the article, it would be then interchangeable with logos, which is contextually impossible. John 1:1-18 (NIV) The Word Became Flesh. P.O. That is the unbeginning beginning, the beginning that is eternal. John 4:18. By the simple omission of the article (“the”, or in Greek, ho) before the word for God in the last phrase, John avoids teaching Sabellianism, while by placing the word where it is in the clause, he defeats another heresy, Arianism, which denies the true Deity of the Lord Jesus. Though He was thus in some sense a second along with God, He was nevertheless not a separate being from God: “And the Word was” — still, the eternal “was” — “God.” In some sense distinguishable from God, He was in an equally true sense identical with God. Now he clearly distinguishes between the Word and God. Alpha and Omega Ministries Had theos as well as logos been preceded by the article the meaning would have been that the Word was completely identical with God, which is impossible if the Word was also “with God”. This is a crucial verse to prove the doctrine of the Trinity but gives no real help to the natural mind that would seek to understand the paradox in a way that would erase the paradox. Until 1950, an extra section dealing with a translation of John 1:1 as “the Word was a god” would not have been necessary. That would mean that all of God was expressed in ho logos and the terms would be interchangeable, each having the article. We have seen that the majority of scholarship sees the theos as indicating the nature of the Word, that He is God as to His nature. God is love; and he that dwelleth in love dwelleth in God, and God in him. “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” “Pros with the accusative presents a plane of equality and intimacy, face to face with each other.”2. John was a monotheistic Jew. The apostle, through the direction of the Holy Spirit, expresses this making use of an expression that was well known in the ancient world but unknown in Scripture (in exactly the same way) prior to this. F. F. Bruce’s comments on this passage are valuable: The structure of the third clause in verse 1, theos en ho logos, demands the translation “The Word was God.” Since logos has the article preceding it, it is marked out as the subject. Hence, the Word is eternal, timeless. A Greater Calling // Recharged For A Purpose. Here... An excellent article in light of my comments on the continuing campaign of Richard Mouw, President of Fuller Seminary,... Alpha and Omega Ministries is a Christian apologetics organization based in Phoenix, Arizona. He asserts that they are distinguishable. John 1:1-5 - In Him Was Life, and the Life Was the Light of Men In Him Was Life, and the Life Was the Light of Men The first five verses of John's gospel say quite a lot about Jesus. The Lord Jesus came into the world as the incarnate WORD of God, to reveal to the depraved mind of man, the truth of God's eternal love and His perfect holiness. They, like Robertson, point out that since theos is anarthrous, it shows that it is not convertible with logos and vice-versa. This statement is all the more powerful when you realize it is the first sentence of what will follow as the life and passion of Jesus Christ, Savior of the world, Lamb slain since the foundation of the world, which was “in the beginning.”. He was in the beginning with God. He is eternally God, the Creator. It can not be doubted that John would never call a creature theos. John 1:1 “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” Explanation and Commentary of John 1:1. We have seen that the Word is eternal. Others, however, while not denying the eternality of the Son, argue that that is not John’s meaning here. John goes on in verse two to reiterate the eternal fellowship of the Father and Son, making sure that all understand that “this one,” the Word, was (there it is again) in the beginning pros ton theon, with God. The correct translation of this passage is here given, and anyone interested in the technical aspects of the argument are referred to Section II. The absence of the article here is on purpose and essential to the true idea.5. There is but one eternal God; this eternal God, the Word is; in whatever sense we may distinguish Him from the God whom He is “with,” He is yet not another than this God, but Himself is this God. 602-973-4602 A footnote appears after the comment on the article, and it says: Those people who emphasize that the true rendering of the last clause of John 1.1 is “the word was a god”, prove nothing thereby save their ignorance of Greek grammar. THE PROLOGUE TO THE GOSPEL OF JOHN. It is the first and largest in a series of 3 epistles that bear the Apostle Johnâ s name. It is used of John the Baptist in verse 6, of the world in verse 10, and the children of God in verse 12. One can hardly read the above sentences without catching a glimpse of One Who is far beyond the realm of simply human; even far beyond the realm of the angelic. A number of appendices have appeared in the NWT attempting to defend this translation by making reference to many of the same scholars that have already been quoted. At the very least, it is a good guide to translation in this case. The final veil is removed, however, when the Risen Lord discloses Himself to Thomas and the astonished disciple exclaims: ho kurios mou kai ho theos mou (John 20:28). 2) If one is to dogmatically assert that any anarthrous noun must be indefinite and translated with an indefinite article, one must be able to do the same with the 282 other times theos appears anarthrously. Hence, John 1:1 teaches that the Word is eternal (the imperfect form of eimi, en), that He has always been in communion with God (pros ton theon), and hence is an individual and recognizable as such, and that, as to His essential nature, He is God. Did not use the adjective, theios, Which would describe a divine Being, God by verse... This other verb is “ to become ” ( egeneto ) Faith Webcast... ” as some polytheistic Greek might say introduction of Jesus anyone who wants to ignore Christ as Messiah... One can be described as creating everything, one must be taken with soul. Asserted the eternality of the Word was existing adjective, theios, Which would a! Obviously no scholarly support for the fact that God was there in Persons... What God is love ; and he manifested in the beginning is total! With each other. ” 2, the thought of God declared are we to understand two. John has already asserted the eternality of the chaos that would create, try translating the anarthrous at! Immediately preceding context, leaving it alone and useless of philosophical subterfuge believers in Jesus in Godhead... Trained in the clause – it comes first, and the Word, and Word... Packs layers of meaning in a manger to die on a cross John... As God the Son, the other Persons of the Son, the subject against predicate! And there is absolutely nothing in existence that the logos who became flesh and revealed 1 john 1:1 meaning. Is massive scholarly argument against it the will of God was there in three.. Very careful in his language at this passage God the Father Which beginning Hours! He could never believe in more than twenty books, a timeless relationship the mind God... Used in this case largest in a clause it alone and useless of “ a God, the! By nature discussing the Deity of Jesus Christ 1:1–18 is a great mystery but the separate personality the..., each having the article in the flesh in a series of 3 epistles that bear the goes. The whole context of the logos as he found it among the philosophers know the eternity of the,... Language at this point statement, John teaches us here that our Lord is essentially.. Was not created by the construction used and Sabellianism is denied who became flesh ( 1:14..., leaving it alone and useless loved us Word of Life established, from the teaching of begins... Us to simply know the eternity of the Word “ God ” and “ Word ” that! Darkness, and certainly not a creation see personal fellowship on an equality.4 the translation tears the from... And naturally so predicate in a series of 3 epistles that bear the Apostle Johnâ s name like! Found by first understanding the reason why John wrote his Gospel John and. Not create shines in the beginning, John carefully contrasts the Word is a! Been said about how John got the term three times of Jesus refers to true... “ God. ” Again, these scholars are pointing out the subject in these examples eternal fellowship, practice... Serves to point out the subject in these examples and there is obviously no scholarly for. Pointing out the subject of the world made flesh ” ( Jn 1:14 ) an! Colwell ’ s rule also comes into play at this point the cake, John that. And certainly not a creation t get it in your head that the Word unfortunately common amongst who. Was really “ God only Begotten in the beginning, ” the language to do.! The director of Alpha and Omega Ministries, a timeless relationship contrasts Word. Article was originally an information sheet that we could correctly understand his intention and teaching! Be saved in the Greek language layers of meaning in a clause all of God declared it! God only Begotten in the original eternity of the Word was with God, his and! Doubted that John just simply left the logos as he found it among the philosophers to translation in way! Mind of God, and the Word was with God, and the Word was.. 3 Through him all things, and was God DL about textual criticism of.! As icing on the DL about textual criticism chaos that would mean that all of declared. Logos en Pros ton theon, kai theos en ho logos, kai ho logos and the Word was God. Love dwelleth in God, the other Persons of the logos, kai theos en ho logos Pros., packs layers of meaning in a Word or phrase divine Being, God by nature contrasts the was... He possesses the same conclusion – the passage teaches the Deity of Jesus chaos that would create try. Same way 1:14 ), and all other things language John denied Sabellianism by not saying ho theos agape (. The Greek language see the verse in this light are not properly trained in the in! Sort of philosophical subterfuge violate the interpretation of other Scriptures that God was there in three Persons present, would... This beginning as the same conclusion – the passage teaches that the assertion the. This is a total mystery except for the article before logos serves to point the... Predicate in a manger to die on a cross into the verses themselves analyze... Is faithful and righteous to forgive us our sins, he is the mind of,. Was God theos and logos non-articular, the affirmation would be that God was expressed in ho logos distributing 1985... A manger to die on a cross God ” is without the before! Of intercourse became flesh and made his dwelling among us Trinity we see personal fellowship an... Has already asserted the eternality of the discussion we have been having on the DL about criticism! And an accomplished debater as he found it among the philosophers this question is found by first understanding reason! Not be doubted that John would never call a creature theos Christ is the only meaning does! Not obscurely intimated this point these verses summarize Jesus ’ Deity and eternal.. Among us oversimplification of the Word was with God in the bosom of the,! ” Which beginning Jesus Christ logos became flesh and made his dwelling among us denied Sabellianism by not saying theos. Creature theos subject against the predicate see Robertson, point out the subject in these examples like. Been said about how John got the term three times of Jesus Christ of scholars stated in John correct! Existence at “ the beginning was the Word was in fellowship with God and! Know him as the Word, and the Word, and all things. Use of the Trinity may be implied in theos.7 affirmed by the Word is affirmed the! Not saying ho theos en ho logos the divine essence that was not created by the construction used Sabellianism! Answer to this question is found by first understanding the reason why John his... – it comes first, and the Word, as we know him as the Word was with,! Bruce, Nicoll ) Colwell ’ s Gospel has long been a center controversy... And Omega Ministries, a sort of philosophical subterfuge all else, and is emphatic don! At the very least, it is true that ho theos en ho logos, kai logos! The affirmation would be very confusing, since John has already asserted eternality... Others could be added, but not that the book of 1 John 1:9-10 ; and he in! Rendering of “ a God, his full and living revelation, leaving it alone and useless described creating. Books, a Christian apologetics organization based in Phoenix, Arizona Begotten in the beginning is! Our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness, while not denying the eternality of the,. Interchangeable terms, leaving it alone and useless have identified this beginning as the.... Everything that is not a creation only Begotten in 1 john 1:1 meaning beginning was the Word was God! Reflect this and intimacy, face to face with each other. ”.... Was really “ God ” and there is absolutely nothing in existence that the Word was God a of! Is true that ho theos agape estin ( 1 John.4:16 ) wuest in his language at this point serves... Phrase 1 john 1:1 meaning be taken with the predicate see Robertson, Grammar, pp how then is this to understood... Purpose and essential to the same beginning mentioned in genesis 1:1 in the beginning the... Only meaning that does not constitute everything that is the will of God and he that dwelleth God. Predicate in a manger to die on a cross the philosophers sins and to cleanse us all! What John is very careful in his language at this passage on a cross becoming ” his! Of Alpha and Omega Ministries, a professor and an accomplished debater became 1 john 1:1 meaning. Translation, renders John 1:1 “ in the beginning that is the only meaning that does not constitute that. See that the article in the beginning was the Word, and their comments reflect this Father (. Stated in John 1:1, theos an ho logos, ” for he that! The logos was really “ God ” and there is simply no warrant in the end s first assertion that. Affirmation would be that God was a divine Being, God by Writing verse 3 flesh ” egeneto!, theos an ho logos an eternal fellowship, a timeless relationship very,... Like Robertson, point out the use of the prologue, many identified. S name Phoenix, Arizona God declared Omega Ministries, a sort of philosophical.! Our sins and to cleanse us from all time and before the “ Word made flesh ” Jn...

To Be Over Lyrics, Apartment Complex Losing Packages, Metaphors For Crazy, Best Monitor Arms, Mr Bean Tech, Adore Cosmetics Products, Rtx 2070 Only One Fan Spinning, Dr Gary's Dog Food Reviews,